A comparative study highlights disaster risk management (DRM) governance differences between Nepal and Switzerland.

Despite facing similar mountain hazards, the two countries operate under vastly different institutional, financial, and developmental conditions, leading to varied approaches in managing risks.

Nepal struggles with limited resources and infrastructure, while Switzerland benefits from robust systems and funding for disaster preparedness.

Long-term vulnerability remains high in Nepal due to ongoing economic challenges and environmental degradation, whereas Switzerland's strong governance mitigates many risks.

What is the long-term climate outlook for this region?

Nepal faces increasing disaster risk without significant improvements in financial support and infrastructure. In contrast, Switzerland’s advanced systems are likely to adapt effectively to future challenges.

The outlook remains grim for Nepal but positive for Switzerland.